2026 B2B Buyer’s Report

Your satisfied customers may already be shopping around.

What makes a B2B brand easier to choose and harder to replace? We asked decision-makers nationwide. Their answers expose the gap between satisfaction and loyalty, the growing influence of AI, and the proof buyers need before they stay, switch, or refer.

The satisfaction trap

“Happy” doesn’t mean the relationship is solid.

Most buyers like their current partners. That does not mean they have stopped evaluating what else is out there.

94%

are satisfied with their current partners.

59%

expect to review or reconsider at least one partner in the next year.

54%

have considered replacing a partner despite being generally satisfied.

Three forces changing the shortlist

The real risk isn’t failure. It’s a competitor that is easier to justify.

The report maps where buyer attention starts, what earns serious consideration, and why solid performance can still leave an incumbent exposed.

Discovery

Buyers are looking in more places.

Professional networks, search, peers, social and AI all shape discovery. Visibility has become a multi-channel requirement.

AI

AI is becoming a shortlist engine.

78% use AI to research partners at least sometimes, and nearly half say it surfaced a provider they might not otherwise have found.

Proof

Good results may not earn advocacy.

Buyers want proof, trust and value. 41% say results that are good, but not exceptional, hold them back from recommending a partner.

Go deeper with the data

Know what makes buyers stay, before they start looking.

We’ll be hosting a webinar series to walk through the findings, unpack what they mean for B2B leaders, and answer questions about how brands can turn the data into action. Download the report and check the webinar box to receive details as sessions are announced.

Get the report + webinar updates →
Abstract B2B research charts for an upcoming webinar
Upcoming webinar series

Inside the report

What buyers won’t always tell you.

  • 1Where decision-makers discover credible new partners
  • 2How AI is changing research, comparison and shortlisting
  • 3What separates consideration from selection
  • 4The moments that turn satisfaction into defection
  • 5What earns retention, referrals and additional budget
48%

AI and B2B agency discovery

Percentage of respondents who say that AI introduced a provider they seriously considered

Almost half of respondents say AI helped surface a vendor they might not otherwise have found. If your B2B marketing expertise is difficult for AI and people to understand, compare and trust, your agency may never make the shortlist.

See what else buyers revealed →

2026 B2B buyer research

Research on the modern B2B buying process.

Original findings on the B2B buyer journey, customer loyalty, partner evaluation and the growing role of AI in B2B marketing.

How is AI changing the B2B buying process?

AI is becoming a meaningful discovery and research channel in the B2B buying process. In Carbon’s study, 78% of respondents use AI to research partners at least sometimes, and 48% said AI introduced a provider they seriously considered.

Why do satisfied B2B customers reconsider their partners?

Satisfaction does not guarantee loyalty. While 94% of respondents are satisfied with their current partners, 59% expect to review or reconsider at least one partner within the next year and 54% have considered replacing a partner despite being generally satisfied.

What strengthens B2B customer loyalty and retention?

B2B customer loyalty depends on more than acceptable performance. Partners strengthen retention by making their expertise, value, trustworthiness and evidence of results consistently visible throughout the relationship.

How do B2B buyers discover and evaluate new vendors?

The B2B buyer journey now moves across professional networks, search, peer recommendations, social platforms and AI tools. Buyers compare expertise, proof, value and the strength of the business case before a vendor reaches the shortlist.

How was Carbon’s 2026 B2B buyer research conducted?

Carbon conducted a national proprietary quantitative study of 189 quality-filtered B2B decision-makers involved in selecting, evaluating or managing partners. The findings have a margin of error of ±7.13% at a 95% confidence interval.